Results
Class F Bootstrapping v2026.07.08.1

PENDLE

Bootstrapping: 670d sampled in a window shorter than two years, so long-horizon resilience is not proven yet. Standout good: OFL gate stayed open 100.0% of the time. Mature PayBack activity is visible, but two-year durability and regime coverage are still untested. Watch-out: deferred PayBack still stands at $120.7K. Class F uses zone-budget Supercharge — check SC (top) / SG (bottom) tiers on the zone pane before treating paths like Class A. Simulated 2026.07.10.1516.

Seed cash yield / yr
21.23%
median 30d windows · not 15% cap
Total PayBack
$4.4M
cumulative
Throughput
196%
net / protected avg
VMR
83%
Value Multiplication Ratio

Price Context & Verdict

The asset experienced a harsh boom-and-bust cycle: rallying +148.0% before collapsing 85.2% from its peak to close the window underwater at -45.1%. System performance must be judged against this deep volatility.

Price Move
-45.1%
2024-09-08 · $2.76 → 2026-07-09 · $1.52
Weighted Entry Price
$2.38
ARCA + SG + EUA · 190,954,117.7223 units
Weighted Exit Price
$1.84
realized + remaining value
Weighted Price Move
-22.5%
weighted exit vs weighted entry · $2.38
Relative VMR
+5.15%
Net VMR -17.31% minus baseline -22.46%
Continued Integration?
Bootstrapping
Continued integration is plausible, but only with active review of backlog, gate behavior, and solvency headroom.

PayBack Executed

Cumulative floor payments over the run (purple), daily PayBack (orange), asset price overlay (cyan). Zone pane: Supercharge top half, Strategic Growth bottom half — tier depth by opacity.

System Scorecard

Capital Flow

Earned inflows
$235.4M
Net throughput
$234.3M
Terminal buffer
$91.7M
Buyback (UN token)
$15.2M

PayBack Record

Total PayBack events
306
PayBack deferred
$120.7K
ARCA admission days
94
ARCI admission days
394

Resilience Check

SCR (solvency)
0.86x
Gate open
100.0%
Bear panics
4
Incidents
1
Hack impact
$7.8M
Deep Dive Charts — milestones, buffers, zone activity

Deeper paths: milestone funding, cyclic buffer, and the same SC/SG zone activity. Hairline values sync across panes. Open by default on desktop; add #lab to force open.

Milestone inflows

Cyclic buffer (CB)

Fundamental View

Outside review dated 2026-07-09

Pendle has become a real yield-market niche rather than a pure trade, but its integration quality still depends on whether tokenized-yield demand survives changes in rates, points programs, and DeFi leverage appetite.

Business / Network

TVL $1.013B

Pendle has built a meaningful position in yield tokenization and fixed/floating yield trading. The favorable point is a clear product niche; the caution is that usage is still more specialized and cycle-dependent than broader DeFi primitives like swaps or base lending.

Technology

160 tracked pools

Its technical proposition is sophisticated yield decomposition across many underlying assets and venues. That is a real differentiator, but it also creates complexity for users and makes integrations more sensitive to changing market structures in underlying yield sources.

Community

Yield-native user base

Pendle has retained a committed DeFi-native audience that understands leverage, points, and fixed-income-like positioning. The good is engaged specialist demand; the bad is that specialist communities can contract quickly when the carry environment becomes less attractive.

Economic

Annualized fees $24.72M

The protocol is producing meaningful fees for its size and still shows multi-chain reach. The caution is that address counts and activity are much smaller than mass-market venues, so growth expectations should stay anchored to niche dominance rather than to universal adoption.

News & Sentiment

Constructive but cyclical

Sentiment is constructive because Pendle proved it can attract real capital, not just speculation. The favorable point is staying power within DeFi yield markets; the caution is that enthusiasm can fade fast if rate compression or incentives reduce the appeal of tokenized-yield trades.

AAVE FBrowse AssetsUNI F