Can a system distribute consistent cash yields through bear markets, hacks, and crashes — and still remain solvent? ARC is the reserve architecture built to answer that. Below are raw backtest results across 12 assets and multi-year windows. No marketing. Just numbers.
Scan the four primaries — then open any asset for the full backtest path, charts, and scorecard.
Sacrificed peak compounding beta to successfully harvest and distribute cash yield.
Harvested yield against a strong tape, but solvency headroom still deserves review.
Sacrificed peak compounding beta to successfully harvest and distribute cash yield.
Clears the cash-realized bar; solvency headroom still deserves review.
Clears the cash-realized bar; solvency headroom still deserves review.
Bootstrapping: 670d sampled in a window shorter than two years, so long-horizon resilience is not proven yet.
Needs tighter scrutiny before presenting as production-grade.
Needs tighter scrutiny before presenting as production-grade.
Harvested yield against a strong tape, but solvency headroom still deserves review.
Pre-Maturity: 89d sampled; mature ARCI obligations are not in-window yet.
Harvested yield against a strong tape, but solvency headroom still deserves review.
Pre-Maturity: 341d sampled; mature ARCI obligations are not in-window yet.
Try adjusting your search or filter criteria.
Relative judgment across assets. Highlighted rows mark VMR outliers (strongest recovery vs weakest). High seed cash yield with low VMR or Fragile status is a contradiction — open Inspect to see why.
| Asset | PayBack / yr | Total PayBack | VMR | Throughput | SCR | Gate open | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTC
Class A · Yield-Harvested |
15.00% | $2.53B | 195% | 1,079% | 0.72x | 96.4% | Class A |
| ETH
Class A · Yield-Harvested |
15.00% | $3.13B | 144% | 731% | 0.66x | 100.0% | Class A |
| NVDA
Class A · Yield-Harvested |
15.00% | $1.54B | 292% | 894% | 0.95x | 100.0% | Class A |
| LINK
Class F · Qualified |
15.00% | $778.8M | 162% | 611% | 0.65x | 100.0% | Class F |
| AAVE
Class F · Qualified |
15.00% | $199.3M | 136% | 671% | 0.77x | 81.4% | Class F |
| PENDLE
Class F · Bootstrapping |
21.23% | $4.4M | 83% | 196% | 0.86x | 100.0% | Class F |
| UNI
Class F · Fragile |
15.00% | $203.1M | 130% | 537% | 0.16x | 89.1% | Class F |
| ARB
Class F · Fragile |
15.00% | $29.9M | 73% | 191% | 0.41x | 85.4% | Class F |
| GOOGL
Class A · Yield-Harvested |
15.00% | $383.6M | 120% | 824% | 0.94x | 78.6% | Class A |
| RAIL
Class F · Pre-Maturity |
0.64% | $6.4K | 411% | 117% | 1.00x | 100.0% | Class F |
| TSLA
Class A · Yield-Harvested |
15.00% | $1.62B | 121% | 670% | 0.70x | 100.0% | Class A |
| ZK
Class F · Pre-Maturity |
1.50% | $9.9K | 68% | 41% | 0.58x | 100.0% | Class F |
Hack impact, bear panics, and full buffer stacks live on each Inspect page and internal canvas.
Backtests are path studies. The endpoint matters, but the route, the thesis, and the time in-window matter too.
ARC is designed to stay solvent, keep paying, and compound through time — not to win from a single entry-to-exit price move. A favorable endpoint can hide beta, while a hostile path can make genuine defensive performance more informative. Read every result through three lenses: the asset's fundamentals, the length and regimes in the window, and whether cash obligations were actually serviced.
The ARC case for staying invested rests on two separate supports: the underlying fundamentals of the asset and enough time for the reserve system to remain in the market and capture volatility. A long decline followed by a surge followed by a new low does not automatically invalidate a position — if the thesis and reserve runway both remain intact. That is resilience through a regime sequence, not a promise that price will recover.
Any asset under two years of simulation cannot establish durability across a full regime cycle or mature obligations. A promising early path is worth noting. It is not worth upgrading into a production-grade claim until the system has serviced a full obligation calendar across multiple market regimes.
Hitting operational goals does not automatically justify continued integration. As fundamentals shift, each asset needs a fresh integration review. The old appeal expires until re-underwritten. The next decision is not automatic continuation — it is an active choice to stay, resize, or exit based on current evidence.
